According to the IAE's latest forecast, US oil production will continue its growth this year, driven largely by the country's ongoing shale oil boom. According to IAE analysts, US growth will take place against a background of stabilizing oil prices, which recently hit their highest level in over three years. Ultimately, the Paris-based organization says high US output will remain possible so long as "OPEC and non-OPEC [price] restraints remain in place."
In an analysis of these ambitious estimates, Igor Naumov, financial observer with Russia's RIA Novosti news agency, wrote that while US capacity for growth is undeniably strong, such growth may very well be the US oil industry's own worst enemy.
"The US is indeed capable of providing for an explosive growth in production. The country has over 22,000 oil and oil/gas fields, the largest of them concentrated in Louisiana, Texas, New Mexico and Oklahoma. 70% of US oil is derived from these fields," the analyst recalled.The goal of at turning the US into an energy superpower, set about five years ago, is not new, Naumov noted. Until the late 1940s, the US already accounted for upwards of 60% of global oil production.
Washington's efforts to restore this status faced considerable setbacks following the sharp drop in oil prices over the past three years, which imposed severe limitations on investment into the massive shale oil fields in states such as North Dakota. The decline is based in the simple fact that while shale requires a price of $50-60 a barrel to break even, traditional production in countries such as Russia or Saudi Arabia requires prices of just $10-15 per barrel, depending on the field.
"Therefore, it was not surprising that beginning in the second half of 2014, when oil prices began to fall, and ending in mid-January 2016, when they reached their absolute low (the price of the OPEC basket dropped to $24.74 p/b), nearly a third of the US's shale oil producers were on the verge of bankruptcy," Naumov wrote.
Catch-22?
With the US Energy Ministry confirming recently that the country's shale oil production has seen steady growth in 2017, and projecting that this growth will continue into 2018, many observers believe that the US's own production may very well be the source of the next price drop.
"Washington, not bound by any obligations within the framework of the OPEC+ deal, concluded between leading oil-producing countries. including Russia, is using that situation to its advantage," Naumov noted.
"This is the effect of the free rider," Russian National Energy Security Fund director Konstantin Simonov explained. According to the analyst, it can't be ruled out that the US output will precipitate a downward trend, gradually rolling prices back to the shale critical benchmark of $50.
The question, according to Naumov, is when this correction will begin, and what effect other factors, such as tensions in the Middle East, the extension of the OPEC+ agreement, and improving global prospects for growth will have.""The answer, it's possible, may be contained in the report of the International Monetary Fund presented at the Davos forum," the observer wrote. The IMF predicts an average of 11.7% growth in oil prices, to $59.90 p/b for 2018, followed by a 4.3% drop the following year, a trend it expects to continue over the next five years.
Moscow, however, remains more confident on prices remaining stable, the journalist noted. Speaking in Davos on Wednesday, Russian Energy Minister Alexander Novak said there was no reason to be concerned about shale. "Shale will not solve all problems. Yes, in the short-term perspective it will cover a growth in consumption, but it will not cover the entire increase," the minister said.
There has been much discussion about how Russia – Europe’s biggest gas supplier – can continue to supply gas to Europe over the coming decades in the most secure and cost efficient way. Gazprom and its European partners have decided that building two additional pipelines through the Baltic Sea (Nord Stream 2) is the best commercial solution to secure future gas supplies for the EU, where gas production continues to decline and demand is expected to grow.
The boom in shale gas production in the US and its wide-ranging influence on markets rocked the gas world. Liquefied gas deliveries were redirected, altering the already fragile balance of demand and supply in traditional markets for pipeline gas in Europe.
World market has shown interest to liquefied gas. Russia has so far been aside of it. However, producers have announced several large LNG projects. The new study will help investigate this delicate subject and understand what is in store for LNG production and export in the nearest years.
A new government was formed in Russia in spring 2024. Sergey Tsivilyov became Energy Minister. The first six months of the new government’s regulation of the fuel and energy sector are already past, which enables drawing the first analytical conclusions. Therefore, interim production results for 2024 have a special place in this research. We analyse the past year in two papers at once, as has become a tradition already. The gas industry is considered in a separate report. Meanwhile, we focus on oil here. The report’s special value lies in the data of our own oil export estimation model.
The Northern Sea Route and the Arctic in general were made a state priority even before the conflict in Ukraine. The key question is: can nice talk about the NSR as a profitable and strategic route and about Russia’s return to the Arctic be converted into actual breakthroughs making it possible to carry out at least the executive’s own plans? The strategic content concerning the NSR is relatively new, but many problems are old.
Getting over the 2022-2024 sanctions is the most important test for the Russian oil industry. After the US, United Kingdom, EU, and G7 introduced a ban on buying Russian oil and petroleum products (with some exceptions) and the price cap mechanism, Russia managed to find alternative sale options in countries that are now commonly called the “Global South”. However, it is important to consider exports in detail. This is what we do in the new NESF report.
In spite of dramatic worsening of relations with the West, the subject of climate has not vanished from Russian economic plans. Environmental issues have even topped the list of declared problems.
While the result of the presidential election in Russia was absolutely predictable, further moves forming new government agencies were more intriguing. Eventually, on the one hand, it would seem that Putin chose to avoid radical decisions on the civilian part of the Cabinet. Prime Minister Mishustin kept his post and almost all deputy prime ministers did. On the other, there are still meaningful changes. First of all, the Ministry of Energy got a new head. This alone deserves special attention.