|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Main page > Products > Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts - The weekly bulletin > Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts. Issue No (36) 724 Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts. Issue No (36) 724August 25-31, 2008 Main tendencies of political weekIn late August just like during the whole month the vector of domestic policies was to a great extent defined by the foreign political situation. The recognition of independence of the Transcaucasian republics and the sharp reaction of the West will have serious consequences for the domestic political layout. If pressure from abroad intensifies, Russian elites may well choose the variant of sovereign patriotic modernization with elements of autarchy. It seems European countries have realized this, which explains their hardly visible yet but softened position. The crisis in Transcaucasia had another positive consequence for the Russian elites: all information about their property abroad may be attributed to intrigues by western secret services. Moreover, the activity of Dmitry Medvedev and Vladimir Putin in mass media once again demonstrated coordination of actions of the duumvirate. In the light of the recent events in Transcaucasia some interesting changes in public opinion took place. Firstly, as it had been expected, a ‘quick victorious war’ increased the level of support to authorities, both Dmitry Medvedev and Vladimir Putin. Secondly, it became clear that attempts of liberal circles to associate actions of contemporary Russia in Georgia with the USSR actions in Czechoslovakia in 1968, failed. Finally, the conflict in Transcaucasia diverted public attention from not very successful performance of Team Russia at the Beijing Olympics and enabled the authorities to replace non-political patriotism with political, which not only retained but also increased the reserve of legitimacy of the current state authorities. Actual failure of Russia’s Olympic team led to the sharpening of a conflict between sports functionaries, who are trying to make each other guilty. Vyacheslav Fetisov, head of the Federal Agency for Physical Culture and Sports (Rossport), has the most vulnerable position, especially considering the upcoming fine-turning of the government this autumn. This may be the reason for his interview, in which he tried to accuse Russian Olympic Committee head Leonid Tyagachev and Sports Minister Vitaly Mutko of the failure. Major events August 25 - August 31, 2008
Volume: 15 pages If you are interested to obtain please contact » Elena Kim Other issues: |
Special report:Nord Stream 2 and Ukraine: Costs Should DecideShale Revolution: Myths and RealitiesLiquefied Natural Gas Outlook: Expectations and RealityAnalytical series “The Political compass”:Political power in Russia after presidential electionState Corporations in the Russian EconomyPolitical Results of 2007: Russia on the Eve of Power ShufflePolitical Landscape Ahead of the Parliamentary Election 2007«Centers of influence» in the Russian politicsLeading Russian corporations and the executive power: interaction methodsForecast of political developments after the presidential election in 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.National Energy Security Fund © 2007 |