|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Main page > Products > Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts - The weekly bulletin > Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts. Issue No (42) 730 Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts. Issue No (42) 730October 6 - 12, 2008 Main tendencies of political weekLast week the power tandem members once again demonstrated their interchangeability and ability to act in a coordinated manner in a crisis situation. Vladimir Putin temporarily ceded his role of the main anti-crisis manager to Dmitry Medvedev and later approved economic decisions made by his successor. The PM paid special attention to a dialogue with mass media. At the same time he made an important statement regarding inadmissibility of direct administrative influence on journalists, which provides for the supposition that authorities will focus on the ‘carrot’ policy in the form of government contracts. There were activities in the party segment of public policy. The agrarian party officially confirmed its intention to join United Russia. This is a mutually beneficial decision: agrarians will have an opportunity to return to federal politics while United Russia at the next regional elections may increase the level of its support in some regions where the agrarian party has been traditionally strong. At the same time attempts of Just Russia to make a symmetric response to UR look futile, because on the party field there are no really attractive assets for acquisition, except the communist party. It should be pointed out that the party politics occupies more and more space in the mainstream, which is testified to by meetings of the power tandem members with party leaders and State Duma deputies. This is likely to be the way state authorities are trying to secure support of all Duma factions amid the crisis. Inside-elite struggle again became latent, though it does not mean it is declining. As expected Yevgeny Bachurin, chief of the federal air transportation service, resigned, which additionally weakens positions of his patron, federal drug control service head Viktor Ivanov. Yet, this was not a really considerable blow for the latter, as the official has lost interest in the aviation industry lately. Radical siloviki headed by Igor Sechin continued strengthening their positions in the electrical energy sector, which can be attributed to several reasons. Finally, representatives of this elite group assumed the offensive on some high-profile cases including the Storchak, Bulbov and Khodorkovsky cases. Major events October 6 - October 13, 2008
Volume: 15 pages If you are interested to obtain please contact » Elena Kim Other issues: |
Special report:Nord Stream 2 and Ukraine: Costs Should DecideShale Revolution: Myths and RealitiesLiquefied Natural Gas Outlook: Expectations and RealityAnalytical series “The Political compass”:Political power in Russia after presidential electionState Corporations in the Russian EconomyPolitical Results of 2007: Russia on the Eve of Power ShufflePolitical Landscape Ahead of the Parliamentary Election 2007«Centers of influence» in the Russian politicsLeading Russian corporations and the executive power: interaction methodsForecast of political developments after the presidential election in 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.National Energy Security Fund © 2007 |