|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Main page > Products > Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts - The weekly bulletin > Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts. Issue No (42) 678 Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts. Issue No (42) 678October 8-14, 2007 Main political trends of the weekLast week experts continued tracing the consequences of Vladimir Putin’s decision to lead United Russia’s parliament ticket. Polls show that the rating of the ”power’s party” has increased but not as sharply as expected – 5-6%, while popularity of other campaigners remains the same or fluctuates within statistical uncertainty. United Russia’s opportunities to boost its popularity are depleted. It may still increase if the party concentrates its efforts and makes some sure bets, for example on a thorough program to elucidate the essence of the "Putin’s plan.” Apart from positive consequences, the Kremlin faced socio-economic issues last week. The increase of prices on primary goods is not only a macroeconomic problem but a political risk as well. Power’s credibility may be undermined not just by the increase of prices but also by the divergence between official statistic and what voters actually see. At that, the mission to find solutions to the problem has been entrusted to regional governments, while the majority of federal power officials are simply trying to find benefits from the bad news. The competition between "uniformed services” continues and the struggling sides have shown readiness to resort to ultimate measures. The newspaper article of Viktor Cherkesov – the head of the Federal Service of the Russian Federation for the Control of Drug Trafficking – published in Kommersant showed that he has lost his opportunities to communicate his point of view to the president. It also indicates that there are no more banned methods in the competition between "security services” and from now on the high brass security heads are allowed to take the conflict to the media. The situation requires immediate interference from the head of state or the people’s attitude to the uniformed services will deteriorate and pre-elections stability may be damaged. The struggle between other elite clans was less noticeable last week but not less intense. Industry and Energy Minister Viktor Khristenko has lost the tactical competition for the opportunity to place a disciple into the position of Federal Industry Agency head. The office has been assumed by a protégé of Boris Aleshin and Sergei Chemezov Andrei Dutov. However, Aleshin’s team was counterbalanced in the executive branch with the new Head of Analytical Center Andrei Zverev, appointed by Viktor Zubkov. The prime minister has also taken measures to gain foothold in the executive power staff. However, the conflict for key government positions did not end last week. Several jobs remain vacant both in the executive branch and in state-owned companies, which may lead to escalation of political in-fighting. Major events Oct 8, 2007 - Oct 14, 2007
Volume: 16 pages If you are interested to obtain please contact » Elena Kim Other issues: |
Special report:Nord Stream 2 and Ukraine: Costs Should DecideShale Revolution: Myths and RealitiesLiquefied Natural Gas Outlook: Expectations and RealityAnalytical series “The Political compass”:Political power in Russia after presidential electionState Corporations in the Russian EconomyPolitical Results of 2007: Russia on the Eve of Power ShufflePolitical Landscape Ahead of the Parliamentary Election 2007«Centers of influence» in the Russian politicsLeading Russian corporations and the executive power: interaction methodsForecast of political developments after the presidential election in 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.National Energy Security Fund © 2007 |