|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Main page > Products > Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts - The weekly bulletin > Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts. Issue No (17) 705 Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts. Issue No (17) 705April 14 - 20, 2008 Vladimir Putin continues building system of checks and balancesThe main event last week was Vladimir Putin’s consent to head United Russia, which, although was quite expected, nevertheless changed the alignment of forces on the political field and served as the final confirmation of the outgoing president’s intention to retain instruments of influence on the situation in the country even after his leaves his current position. Formalized leadership in the ‘party of power’ will enable him to influence federal elites as well as regional elites, as almost all governors and mayors of major cities are members of the United Russia party. However, such strengthening of cooperation between Vladimir Putin and United Russia does not mean shift to the party based government: this is first of all not in the interests of the outgoing president. Despite Vladimir Putin’s firm intention not to lose ground, his ‘successor’ also does not want to play the role of a ‘technical’ president. In particular, his meetings with representatives of the elite within the framework of the process of informal assumption of the office suggest that they are not of a protocol character only. At the same time the future president considers business that he favors as his key support in addition to the judicial brunch of power. It should be noted that the ‘successor’ also receives considerable support from many mass media sources that are controlled by his supporters. In particular, publications in some mass media are aimed at convincing middle and low level officials that the process of reorientation of the elites on the new president has begun and it will not stop. Vladimir Putin’s decision to head United Russia has affected the positioning of the party, whose role as the conductor of his interests will substantially increase. This was evident in Boris Gryzlov’s speech at the congress that contained several new points, in particular the criticism of state corporations. In addition, the intention to transfer them from under control of the president to the parliament and to improve control of the State Duma over the expenditure of the Investment Fund resources was clearly shaped. Despite the upcoming government reshuffle, staff struggle is not abating. It has become more virtual and latent. Amid the ‘calmed down’ security-related bloc, representatives of the second and third levels of government have become more active. Government agencies are the most energetic so far as their heads have been lobbying transformation of agencies into state committees. Major events April 14 - April 20, 2008
Volume: 17 pages If you are interested to obtain please contact » Elena Kim Other issues: |
Special report:Nord Stream 2 and Ukraine: Costs Should DecideShale Revolution: Myths and RealitiesLiquefied Natural Gas Outlook: Expectations and RealityAnalytical series “The Political compass”:Political power in Russia after presidential electionState Corporations in the Russian EconomyPolitical Results of 2007: Russia on the Eve of Power ShufflePolitical Landscape Ahead of the Parliamentary Election 2007«Centers of influence» in the Russian politicsLeading Russian corporations and the executive power: interaction methodsForecast of political developments after the presidential election in 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.National Energy Security Fund © 2007 |