|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Main page > Products > Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts - The weekly bulletin > Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts. Issue No (46) 787 Politics in Russia: power, lobby, conflicts. Issue No (46) 787November 09 - 15, 2009 Main tendencies of political weekPromulgation of Dmitry Medvedev’s state of the nation address became the major event of last week and of the political season in general. On one side, the document was more concrete than last year’s document devoted mainly to values. On the other side, the latest address has tactical tasks (macroeconomic issues at the beginning of the speech) balanced by strategic ones (creation of preconditions for the emergence of the innovative social environment). Initiatives in the cultural, educational and political spheres are mostly strategic, including inter alia the Our New School project. The president’s remark that “the strengthening of democracy does not mean the weakening of law and order” should be singled out – this was a final response to assumptions that the president would recognize the October 11 elections as “wrong” and would critically evaluate the Russian election and party system. Changes in the format of drafting the document also influenced the chronological framework of interpretations in the media. Previously interpretations were voiced only post factum but this time they were made in the form of forecasts and wishes. Liberals hoped for the easing of political “restrictions”, businessmen counted on changes in taxation. The closer the day of the address’s promulgation, the higher the pressure on the president urging him to conduct independent policies was. The initial reaction to the presidential address that some part of the liberal camp was disappointed with contained mostly reproaches for its lack of clarity and most importantly the lack of a regal style. At the same time, it was not taken into account that state authorities were changing stylistics having proclaimed the course at non-violent modernization. Thus, the reference to periods of Russia’s history connected to forced modernization (the rule of Peter the Great and Joseph Stalin) was methodologically wrong. Attempts to pressurize the ruling tandem through other channels did not stop. The media campaign launched with the posting of a video message by police major Alexey Dymovsky has a strategic objective to test the tandem’s strength. If Dmitry Medvedev dismisses the interior minister, this will be interpreted as the beginning of a serious reshuffle and the takeover of levers of governance from Putin by Medvedev, which may disorient elites. At the same time, the interior ministry is a “weak link” of the governance system causing serious complaints of citizens. Thus, the tandem is facing a hard choice – either possible variant may lead to substantial risks. Major events November 09 - 15, 2009
Volume: 14 pages If you are interested to obtain please contact » Elena Kim Other issues: |
Special report:Nord Stream 2 and Ukraine: Costs Should DecideShale Revolution: Myths and RealitiesLiquefied Natural Gas Outlook: Expectations and RealityAnalytical series “The Political compass”:Political power in Russia after presidential electionState Corporations in the Russian EconomyPolitical Results of 2007: Russia on the Eve of Power ShufflePolitical Landscape Ahead of the Parliamentary Election 2007«Centers of influence» in the Russian politicsLeading Russian corporations and the executive power: interaction methodsForecast of political developments after the presidential election in 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.National Energy Security Fund © 2007 |