Main page > Comments > Actual topics > Nuclear accident in Japan, prospects of “gas age”

Nuclear accident in Japan, prospects of “gas age”

The situation at Japanese NPPs hit by powerful earthquakes is developing rapidly and it is rather difficult to forecast the final scale of the accident. Anyway expectations of experts and politicians are becoming more alarming. In particular, EU energy commissioner Guenther Oettinger even described the situation at the Fukushima 1 nuclear plant as apocalypse. The future will show whether these words are exaggeration; but even if Japanese engineers and state authorities manage to prevent catastrophic developments, the downward revision of plans to build new NPPs in the world is practically inevitable.

At least we can expect the surge in anti-nuclear sentiments in Europe; although the latter is not located in the seismically dangerous zone, it is very sensitive to environmental issues. In the next few years the word ecology will be surely associated with nuclear problems in public debates about energy pushing back discussions about greenhouse gas and other emissions.

In this case (at least on the European market) the demand for energy sources alternative to nuclear energy will emerge. And only natural gas can be this alternative. Oil and coal are not worthy competitors to gas because of their low environmental friendliness, while nontraditional sources of energy (bio fuel, wind and solar plants, hydrogen fuel elements) are expensive; besides, the current level of technological development cannot ensure uninterrupted generation of energy from these sources regardless of weather conditions. This leads to the creation of objective conditions for the “gas age” – the period of active use of this fuel for at least 15 to 20 or even 30 years. The duration of this “gas age” will depend on the pace of technological progress in the sphere of alternative energy or on the quality breakthrough in safety and economy of peaceful nuclear energy (if the latter breakthrough happens at all).

Obviously the “gas age” opens serious commercial and probably political prospects for major gas exporters such as Russia. Many large importers including Europe will feel the connection between commercial and political prospects of Russia, which will require delicate moves by Moscow to remove at least part of its partners’ concerns. 

By Stanistav Mitrakhovich, NESF leading expert



Bookmark and Share

Analytical series “The Fuel and Energy Complex of Russia”:

Gazprom on the background of external and internal challenges
Regulation of Oil and Gas Sector in 2019 and Prospects for 2020
Fiscal Policy on Oil and Gas Sector: Revised as Often as Wikipedia
The tax system in the oil and gas sector continues to undergo radical changes. The beginning of 2019 saw the introduction of a new tax regime: additional income tax. That experiment was supposed to start migration of the oil industry to an innovative principle of taxation: on profit, not revenue. It seemed that a new main road was found. In the same year, however, the Finance Ministry launched an overt offensive against AIT. The fear of loss of government revenue now is more powerful than the threat of causing oil production to collapse in the medium term because of a tax system that does not stimulate investment. The Finance Ministry would strongly prefer to speed up the tax manoeuvre completion that earns the state budget additional money. Oil and gas companies respond to this with individual lobbying, attempting to wangle special treatment for their projects.
Ukrainian Gas Hub: Climax at Hand
The “zero hour” comes in less than a month: the contracts for gas transit through Ukraine and for supplying Russian gas to the country terminate at 10 am on 1 January. Meanwhile, Gazprom and Naftogaz are very far from looking for a mutually acceptable solution. The entire European gas business is watching intently the negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. Everyone is waiting for a new “gas war”: the January 2009 events proved to be a serious test both to European consumers and to Gazprom as a supplier. Is there still a chance of agreement? If there is not, will Gazprom cope with its obligations to deliver gas to Europe? Is Russia bluffing as it assures that the new infrastructure and gas in underground storage facilities will enable it to get by without Ukrainian transit even as soon as this winter? What will happen to Ukraine itself at the beginning of 2020?
Digitisation and Its Implications for Oil and Gas: Myths and Possible Reality

All reports for: 2015 , 14 , 13 , 12 , 11 , 10 , 09 , 08 , 07

Rambler's Top100
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts
Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.
National Energy Security Fund © 2007