Main page > Comments > Actual topics > No changes at talks with Ukraine

No changes at talks with Ukraine

After Vladimir Putin visited Kiev he commissioned his deputy Igor Sechin to negotiate with the Ukrainian side; Sechin was to meet with Ukrainian deputy PM Andrey Klyuyev. However, no public reports about it have been posted, which makes us assume there is no progress the sides can publicly boast about.

Russia’s position is clear – it is necessary to create a consortium to manage Ukraine’s gas transportation system with Gazprom playing a major role in it. The Russian gas giant needs absolute guarantees of security of gas supplies to the EU. This can be ensured by being a major stakeholder having a direct access to transit pipelines. In this case they can start agreeing on terminating the South Stream project.

Ukraine’s position is less consistent. It does not want to cede its GTS considered to be “national treasure” to Gazprom. Even speculations about a possible transfer of the GTS to Naftogaz with later IPO of the Ukrainian holding are accompanied by statements that the shares can be bought by some western investors, not Russians. However, it is not clear why they would invest in aging pipelines without guarantees of them being filled with Russian gas.

Another argument Kiev is actively promoting is the illegitimacy of the January 2009 gas accord, which should be confirmed by criminal cases against Yulia Timoshenko and her former companions. But this is a double-edged weapon – with such an approach any agreement made by any government, including Azarov’s Cabinet, can be announced void. Although such arguments are weak, Kiev is likely to continue attempts to use them in its dialogue with Moscow for some time.

By Stanislav Mitrakhovich, NESF leading expert

Bookmark and Share

Analytical series “The Fuel and Energy Complex of Russia”:

Gazprom on the background of external and internal challenges
Regulation of Oil and Gas Sector in 2019 and Prospects for 2020
Fiscal Policy on Oil and Gas Sector: Revised as Often as Wikipedia
The tax system in the oil and gas sector continues to undergo radical changes. The beginning of 2019 saw the introduction of a new tax regime: additional income tax. That experiment was supposed to start migration of the oil industry to an innovative principle of taxation: on profit, not revenue. It seemed that a new main road was found. In the same year, however, the Finance Ministry launched an overt offensive against AIT. The fear of loss of government revenue now is more powerful than the threat of causing oil production to collapse in the medium term because of a tax system that does not stimulate investment. The Finance Ministry would strongly prefer to speed up the tax manoeuvre completion that earns the state budget additional money. Oil and gas companies respond to this with individual lobbying, attempting to wangle special treatment for their projects.
Ukrainian Gas Hub: Climax at Hand
The “zero hour” comes in less than a month: the contracts for gas transit through Ukraine and for supplying Russian gas to the country terminate at 10 am on 1 January. Meanwhile, Gazprom and Naftogaz are very far from looking for a mutually acceptable solution. The entire European gas business is watching intently the negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. Everyone is waiting for a new “gas war”: the January 2009 events proved to be a serious test both to European consumers and to Gazprom as a supplier. Is there still a chance of agreement? If there is not, will Gazprom cope with its obligations to deliver gas to Europe? Is Russia bluffing as it assures that the new infrastructure and gas in underground storage facilities will enable it to get by without Ukrainian transit even as soon as this winter? What will happen to Ukraine itself at the beginning of 2020?
Digitisation and Its Implications for Oil and Gas: Myths and Possible Reality

All reports for: 2015 , 14 , 13 , 12 , 11 , 10 , 09 , 08 , 07

Rambler's Top100
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts
Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.
National Energy Security Fund © 2007