Main page > Comments > Actual topics > Is Iran alternative to Gazprom?

Is Iran alternative to Gazprom?

Several Middle East nations, namely Iran, Iraq and Syria, have recently signed a memorandum on building a gas pipeline through Lebanon to Western Europe with its resource base being the South Pars field in Iran. The 5,000km long pipeline project is estimated at $10bn.

Iranian lobbyists, who convince the public of Europe’s intention to quickly substitute Russian natural gas with the Iranian fuel, have already positively assessed the memorandum, which is just a declaration of intentions so far. From the purely technological point of view as well as economic perspective, constructing a pipeline from Iran to Europe is quite possible. With corresponding foreign investments in production, Iranian gas reserves may well enable the Islamic state to become one of the leading fuel suppliers to the EU pushing aside other competitors including Gazprom. Actually the ill-fated Nabucco project was initially based on Iranian gas.

But in practice this scenario is unlikely due to political risks. Despite the accelerated pace of Islamization of Europe, European politicians are not ready yet to dare to replace “unreliable Russia” with allegedly “reliable Iran”. Slogans of the necessity to remove neighboring states from the political map do not really find understanding in European capitals, which will impede practical negotiations on large-scale gas supplies. The US factor is also in place – amid tough confrontation between Washington and Tehran it would risky to lay pipelines from Iran to Europe. Moreover, at the next elections to the While House “peacekeeper Obama” may be succeeded by a Republican candidate who will share a more traditional approach of the US Establishment to the Middle East policy.

Investments may be lost also because of possible combat operations between Iran and Israel. In the next few years the Iranian regime will accumulate capacity to create an atomic bomb, which may well lead to a preventive (as Israel warns) strike by the Jewish state. This consequently may result in a regional conventional or nuclear war.

One also should not forget about discontent with Iranian expansion in the Arab world. Saudi Arabia’s Prince Turki al-Faisal directly declared his country would produce its own nuclear weapon should Iran create the bomb. Thus, already in the next decade a large-scale Saudi-Iranian war should not be ruled out coupled with traditional Sunni-Shiite confrontation. Lately Tehran has been promising to ship cargo to Bahrain to assist local Shiites considering actions of the Saudi military in this country as suppression of the Shia uprising. Indirect collision of Saudi Arabia and Iran, the so-called proxy war, is already observed in Syria being one of the detonators of the unfolding civil unrest in this state.

Analyzing risks of gas transit in this region there is another important factor that should not be omitted – a possibility of resumption of a full-scale civil war in Iraq between the Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds after the US finally withdraws its armed forces from this country. Different ethnic and religious groups in Iraq may have contradicting ideas about the belonging of this or that deposit or a pipeline to certain owners.

Considering all these factors, the desire to replace Russian natural gas with the Iranian fuel would be a risky decision by European consumers to say the least.

By Stanislav Mitrakhovich, NESF leading expert


Bookmark and Share

Analytical series “The Fuel and Energy Complex of Russia”:

Gazprom on the background of external and internal challenges
Regulation of Oil and Gas Sector in 2019 and Prospects for 2020
Fiscal Policy on Oil and Gas Sector: Revised as Often as Wikipedia
The tax system in the oil and gas sector continues to undergo radical changes. The beginning of 2019 saw the introduction of a new tax regime: additional income tax. That experiment was supposed to start migration of the oil industry to an innovative principle of taxation: on profit, not revenue. It seemed that a new main road was found. In the same year, however, the Finance Ministry launched an overt offensive against AIT. The fear of loss of government revenue now is more powerful than the threat of causing oil production to collapse in the medium term because of a tax system that does not stimulate investment. The Finance Ministry would strongly prefer to speed up the tax manoeuvre completion that earns the state budget additional money. Oil and gas companies respond to this with individual lobbying, attempting to wangle special treatment for their projects.
Ukrainian Gas Hub: Climax at Hand
The “zero hour” comes in less than a month: the contracts for gas transit through Ukraine and for supplying Russian gas to the country terminate at 10 am on 1 January. Meanwhile, Gazprom and Naftogaz are very far from looking for a mutually acceptable solution. The entire European gas business is watching intently the negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. Everyone is waiting for a new “gas war”: the January 2009 events proved to be a serious test both to European consumers and to Gazprom as a supplier. Is there still a chance of agreement? If there is not, will Gazprom cope with its obligations to deliver gas to Europe? Is Russia bluffing as it assures that the new infrastructure and gas in underground storage facilities will enable it to get by without Ukrainian transit even as soon as this winter? What will happen to Ukraine itself at the beginning of 2020?
Digitisation and Its Implications for Oil and Gas: Myths and Possible Reality

All reports for: 2015 , 14 , 13 , 12 , 11 , 10 , 09 , 08 , 07

Rambler's Top100
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts
Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.
National Energy Security Fund © 2007

LiveInternet