Main page > Comments > Actual topics > Gas pipeline via North Korea, project risks

Gas pipeline via North Korea, project risks

Possible construction of a gas pipeline from Russia to South Korea via North Korea has been actively discussed lately. There are indeed some arguments in favor of this project. South Korea has a developed industry and quite high living standards; it will inevitably increase exports of hydrocarbons. Russia may well become a source of such supplies considering growth in political instability in the Middle East creating risks to permanence of supplies from this region. Quite probable decline in nuclear energy production in the whole world and in Southeastern Asia in particular following the Fukushima catastrophe will also play into the hands of producers of hydrocarbons, including Russia. A political component should be also taken into account – if the trans-Korean gas pipeline is fully and constantly loaded, the sides engaged in this project may theoretically increase the level of trust in each other. Finally, there will be an additional possibility to employ construction capacities of Russian contractors.

But in reality such plans are unlikely to be put into practice. The current political regime in North Korea is very unpredictable both for Moscow and Seoul. Pyongyang will surely try to blackmail them by cutting off transit in every case of sharpening of a political situation, which is not a rare thing on the Korean peninsula where risks of full-scale war between the North and the South still exist. Thus, the more probable scenario is building a facility producing LNG or CNG in Vladivostok or in Sakhalin to ship fuel to South Korea by tankers.

By Stanislav Mitrakhovich, NESF leading expert


Bookmark and Share

Analytical series “The Fuel and Energy Complex of Russia”:

Gazprom on the background of external and internal challenges
Regulation of Oil and Gas Sector in 2019 and Prospects for 2020
Fiscal Policy on Oil and Gas Sector: Revised as Often as Wikipedia
The tax system in the oil and gas sector continues to undergo radical changes. The beginning of 2019 saw the introduction of a new tax regime: additional income tax. That experiment was supposed to start migration of the oil industry to an innovative principle of taxation: on profit, not revenue. It seemed that a new main road was found. In the same year, however, the Finance Ministry launched an overt offensive against AIT. The fear of loss of government revenue now is more powerful than the threat of causing oil production to collapse in the medium term because of a tax system that does not stimulate investment. The Finance Ministry would strongly prefer to speed up the tax manoeuvre completion that earns the state budget additional money. Oil and gas companies respond to this with individual lobbying, attempting to wangle special treatment for their projects.
Ukrainian Gas Hub: Climax at Hand
The “zero hour” comes in less than a month: the contracts for gas transit through Ukraine and for supplying Russian gas to the country terminate at 10 am on 1 January. Meanwhile, Gazprom and Naftogaz are very far from looking for a mutually acceptable solution. The entire European gas business is watching intently the negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. Everyone is waiting for a new “gas war”: the January 2009 events proved to be a serious test both to European consumers and to Gazprom as a supplier. Is there still a chance of agreement? If there is not, will Gazprom cope with its obligations to deliver gas to Europe? Is Russia bluffing as it assures that the new infrastructure and gas in underground storage facilities will enable it to get by without Ukrainian transit even as soon as this winter? What will happen to Ukraine itself at the beginning of 2020?
Digitisation and Its Implications for Oil and Gas: Myths and Possible Reality

All reports for: 2015 , 14 , 13 , 12 , 11 , 10 , 09 , 08 , 07

Rambler's Top100
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts
Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.
National Energy Security Fund © 2007

LiveInternet