Main page > Comments > Actual topics > Relations with Ukraine aggravate

Relations with Ukraine aggravate

Risks of a new gas war between Russia and Ukraine have grown over the past few weeks. Kiev continues coining new arguments looking for a pretext to terminate gas contracts signed in January 2009. Promises to appeal to the Stockholm arbitration court were followed by the idea to make use of a probable sentence of Julia Timoshenko, who will be soon declared a real “criminal”. But since the former Orange Revolution princess is defended not only by Russia but also by Brussels and Washington that see a purely domestic political motive in this case, Kiev had to find another way to terminate the contracts – by liquidating Naftogaz.

So far Moscow is acting toughly hoping that Kiev is not really determined to go for broke, i.e. to break the agreements without sanction of international arbitration instances and start siphoning off the fuel. Judging by the two previous gas rows, Russia will call such actions theft and will cut off gas supplies to the Ukrainian gas transportation system. This would damage the reputation of both Russia and Ukraine. Thus, Russia has a reason to hope that Ukrainian state authorities will not resort to a radical variant. However, considering personal accusations of Russian and Ukrainian officials against each other and their mutual unwillingness to look like wimps, one should not rule out a possibility of suspension of the Ukrainian transit before the end of 2011.

An important question is which side the EU will take. Previously Europe preferred to maintain neutrality; currently the European Union is also trying to stay aside from the Russian-Ukrainian conflict simultaneously buying natural gas to fill underground gas storages (the current gas reserves in EU underground facilities are 25% to 30% larger than in the corresponding period in 2010). Yet, the current conflict has one significant difference – the idea to redirect gas deliveries through the Ukrainian system to other pipelines used to be just an idea in the past, but following the launch of the first line of Nord Stream Russia vividly demonstrates that it is able to partially solve the Ukrainian problem although at a high price. South Stream will fully solve this problem. Europe may view this as a reason to support Russia as a player that, in any case, will remain the European Union’s key energy partner. Ukraine, on the contrary, after the new gas war, which will legitimize construction of South Stream, risks falling out of the Russia-EU energy ties for decades.

By Stanislav Mitrakhovich, NESF leading expert


Bookmark and Share

Analytical series “The Fuel and Energy Complex of Russia”:

Gazprom on the background of external and internal challenges
Regulation of Oil and Gas Sector in 2019 and Prospects for 2020
Fiscal Policy on Oil and Gas Sector: Revised as Often as Wikipedia
The tax system in the oil and gas sector continues to undergo radical changes. The beginning of 2019 saw the introduction of a new tax regime: additional income tax. That experiment was supposed to start migration of the oil industry to an innovative principle of taxation: on profit, not revenue. It seemed that a new main road was found. In the same year, however, the Finance Ministry launched an overt offensive against AIT. The fear of loss of government revenue now is more powerful than the threat of causing oil production to collapse in the medium term because of a tax system that does not stimulate investment. The Finance Ministry would strongly prefer to speed up the tax manoeuvre completion that earns the state budget additional money. Oil and gas companies respond to this with individual lobbying, attempting to wangle special treatment for their projects.
Ukrainian Gas Hub: Climax at Hand
The “zero hour” comes in less than a month: the contracts for gas transit through Ukraine and for supplying Russian gas to the country terminate at 10 am on 1 January. Meanwhile, Gazprom and Naftogaz are very far from looking for a mutually acceptable solution. The entire European gas business is watching intently the negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. Everyone is waiting for a new “gas war”: the January 2009 events proved to be a serious test both to European consumers and to Gazprom as a supplier. Is there still a chance of agreement? If there is not, will Gazprom cope with its obligations to deliver gas to Europe? Is Russia bluffing as it assures that the new infrastructure and gas in underground storage facilities will enable it to get by without Ukrainian transit even as soon as this winter? What will happen to Ukraine itself at the beginning of 2020?
Digitisation and Its Implications for Oil and Gas: Myths and Possible Reality

All reports for: 2015 , 14 , 13 , 12 , 11 , 10 , 09 , 08 , 07

Rambler's Top100
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts
Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.
National Energy Security Fund © 2007

LiveInternet