Main page > Comments > Actual topics > Turkish risks for EU and Russia

Turkish risks for EU and Russia

Over the past few years Turkey has been claiming the role of the main regional gas dispatcher managing major transit flows. Ankara’s ambitions are quite seriously substantiated, because practically all pipeline projects implemented recently or planned for the future run through Turkey or its economic zone in the Black Sea. This concerns projects initiated or supported by Russia (Blue Stream, South Stream and Samsun-Ceyhan) as well as those promoted by the European Union (Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan, Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum, Nabucco and other projects of the Southern Transportation Corridor).

Being carried away by struggle against each other, Russia and the EU, supported by the USA, in fact encourage Turkey and speed up implementation of the neo-Ottoman concept that has been ripening for several years. This ideology is based on assigning Turkey the status of major regional superpower that would have dominating influence on areas that used to be part of the Ottoman Empire (Arab, Caucasus and Balkan states). The moderate Islamic triumvirate ruling Turkey currently (PM Erdogan, president Gul and foreign minister Davutoglu) consists of people who have strong geo-economic and geopolitical ambitions.

We can mention just recent firm demands of Ankara to Europe not to allow Cyprus to chair the EU or Erdogan’s request to the German government to ensure that children of Turkish origin living in Germany are taught Turkish as the first and main language at German school. Despite numerous promises, Turkey has not issued a permit to Russia to lay South Stream pipes in Turkey’s exclusive economic zone. There are also doubts about economic advantages of a contract on building a nuclear power plant by Russia in Turkey; expenses will be recovered in a decade at best. The Samsun-Ceyhan oil pipeline project is also questionable as it does not enable Russian oil exports in the southern direction to bypass Turkey, which was the reason for designing the Burgas-Alexandropoulos project. All these issues make us ponder over whether attempts of the EU and Russia to work out their energy strategies, that stipulate larger dependence on political sentiments in Ankara, are justified in the long-term perspective.

By Stanislav Mitrakhovich, NESF leading expert


Bookmark and Share

Analytical series “The Fuel and Energy Complex of Russia”:

Gazprom on the background of external and internal challenges
Regulation of Oil and Gas Sector in 2019 and Prospects for 2020
Fiscal Policy on Oil and Gas Sector: Revised as Often as Wikipedia
The tax system in the oil and gas sector continues to undergo radical changes. The beginning of 2019 saw the introduction of a new tax regime: additional income tax. That experiment was supposed to start migration of the oil industry to an innovative principle of taxation: on profit, not revenue. It seemed that a new main road was found. In the same year, however, the Finance Ministry launched an overt offensive against AIT. The fear of loss of government revenue now is more powerful than the threat of causing oil production to collapse in the medium term because of a tax system that does not stimulate investment. The Finance Ministry would strongly prefer to speed up the tax manoeuvre completion that earns the state budget additional money. Oil and gas companies respond to this with individual lobbying, attempting to wangle special treatment for their projects.
Ukrainian Gas Hub: Climax at Hand
The “zero hour” comes in less than a month: the contracts for gas transit through Ukraine and for supplying Russian gas to the country terminate at 10 am on 1 January. Meanwhile, Gazprom and Naftogaz are very far from looking for a mutually acceptable solution. The entire European gas business is watching intently the negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. Everyone is waiting for a new “gas war”: the January 2009 events proved to be a serious test both to European consumers and to Gazprom as a supplier. Is there still a chance of agreement? If there is not, will Gazprom cope with its obligations to deliver gas to Europe? Is Russia bluffing as it assures that the new infrastructure and gas in underground storage facilities will enable it to get by without Ukrainian transit even as soon as this winter? What will happen to Ukraine itself at the beginning of 2020?
Digitisation and Its Implications for Oil and Gas: Myths and Possible Reality

All reports for: 2015 , 14 , 13 , 12 , 11 , 10 , 09 , 08 , 07

Rambler's Top100
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts
Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.
National Energy Security Fund © 2007

LiveInternet