Main page > Comments > Actual topics > Russia and South Korea: energy and policy

Russia and South Korea: energy and policy

Russian president Dmitry Medvedev met his South Korean counterpart Lee Myung-bak on November 2, 2011. The leaders discussed inter alia issues of gas cooperation. According to Gazprom CEO Alexey Miller, “supplies of Russian piped gas to South Korea might be expected in 2017”.

There are serious premises for Russian-South Korean political and energy cooperation that is currently at the very initial stage so far. South Korea is a highly-developed industrial country where the demand for natural gas will be inevitably growing, especially considering risks of the nuclear energy sector development after the Fukushima catastrophe in Japan. From the political point of view, Seoul is interested in advanced relations with a number of states, including Russia, as such partnerships could soften risks of huge growth in China’s influence.

Although Russian authorities do not admit it publicly, they are also looking for priority partners in the region that could create some counterbalance to the strengthening PRC and could provide Russia with a possibility to diversify deliveries of hydrocarbons in the eastern direction. Relations between Moscow and Tokyo are still complicated over the Kuril Islands. Meanwhile, there are no serious political obstacles to development of close ties with Seoul. Gas supplies may form the basis for the beginning of development of such relations. However, it seems that a more optimal variant would be organizing LNG or CNG supplies by tankers from Vladivostok (after corresponding infrastructure is built at the end of the Sakhalin-Khabarovsk-Vladivostok pipeline) rather than laying a trans-Korean gas pipeline through North Korea that would make deliveries dependent on the North Korean regime. It would be even better to have direct supplies from a new phase of the LNG facility that could be built within Sakhakin-2.

By Stanislav Mitrakhovich, NESF leading expert

Bookmark and Share

Analytical series “The Fuel and Energy Complex of Russia”:

Gazprom on the background of external and internal challenges
Regulation of Oil and Gas Sector in 2019 and Prospects for 2020
Fiscal Policy on Oil and Gas Sector: Revised as Often as Wikipedia
The tax system in the oil and gas sector continues to undergo radical changes. The beginning of 2019 saw the introduction of a new tax regime: additional income tax. That experiment was supposed to start migration of the oil industry to an innovative principle of taxation: on profit, not revenue. It seemed that a new main road was found. In the same year, however, the Finance Ministry launched an overt offensive against AIT. The fear of loss of government revenue now is more powerful than the threat of causing oil production to collapse in the medium term because of a tax system that does not stimulate investment. The Finance Ministry would strongly prefer to speed up the tax manoeuvre completion that earns the state budget additional money. Oil and gas companies respond to this with individual lobbying, attempting to wangle special treatment for their projects.
Ukrainian Gas Hub: Climax at Hand
The “zero hour” comes in less than a month: the contracts for gas transit through Ukraine and for supplying Russian gas to the country terminate at 10 am on 1 January. Meanwhile, Gazprom and Naftogaz are very far from looking for a mutually acceptable solution. The entire European gas business is watching intently the negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. Everyone is waiting for a new “gas war”: the January 2009 events proved to be a serious test both to European consumers and to Gazprom as a supplier. Is there still a chance of agreement? If there is not, will Gazprom cope with its obligations to deliver gas to Europe? Is Russia bluffing as it assures that the new infrastructure and gas in underground storage facilities will enable it to get by without Ukrainian transit even as soon as this winter? What will happen to Ukraine itself at the beginning of 2020?
Digitisation and Its Implications for Oil and Gas: Myths and Possible Reality

All reports for: 2015 , 14 , 13 , 12 , 11 , 10 , 09 , 08 , 07

Rambler's Top100
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts
Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.
National Energy Security Fund © 2007