Main page > Comments > Actual topics > Risks of trans-Korean gas pipeline

Risks of trans-Korean gas pipeline

There have been more leaks to the mass media and the expert community from the foreign ministry and Gazprom about details of a project on laying a gas pipeline from Russia to South Korea via North Korea. According to the latest speculations, Gazprom intends to sign a contract with South Korea’s Kogas in spring 2012. According to the document under discussion, the Russian side will build a 700km transit section of the gas pipeline in North Korea for approximately $2.5bn. Natural gas is likely to be sold at the South Korean border, not at the entry to North Korea.

The problem is whether we can believe the assurances of diplomatic and commercial negotiators of both Seoul and Pyongyang having provided guarantees of normal work of the gas pipeline. Project enthusiasts say that North Korea is so much interested in a trans-Korean gas pipeline (it will get transit revenues) that it will not shut it down over political reasons.

However, the history of North Korea and its political regime has shown that ideological motives often prevail over economic ideas in the decision-making pattern of Pyongyang leaders. To be exact, political or military and political threats against Seoul are a means of earning additional money. The scheme is simple – by blackmailing and threatening even to use the military force it is possible to get concessions from the neighbor (from financial aid to additional supplies of food and fuel). Thus, there is no guarantee that if the constantly smoldering conflict between the Koreas intensifies, Pyongyang will not cut off the gas transit. A more rational move for Gazprom could be reconsidering the idea of building new LNG facilities in Sakhalin to deliver natural gas to South Korea by tankers. 

By Stanislav Mitrakhovich, NESF leading expert

Bookmark and Share

Analytical series “The Fuel and Energy Complex of Russia”:

Gazprom on the background of external and internal challenges
Regulation of Oil and Gas Sector in 2019 and Prospects for 2020
Fiscal Policy on Oil and Gas Sector: Revised as Often as Wikipedia
The tax system in the oil and gas sector continues to undergo radical changes. The beginning of 2019 saw the introduction of a new tax regime: additional income tax. That experiment was supposed to start migration of the oil industry to an innovative principle of taxation: on profit, not revenue. It seemed that a new main road was found. In the same year, however, the Finance Ministry launched an overt offensive against AIT. The fear of loss of government revenue now is more powerful than the threat of causing oil production to collapse in the medium term because of a tax system that does not stimulate investment. The Finance Ministry would strongly prefer to speed up the tax manoeuvre completion that earns the state budget additional money. Oil and gas companies respond to this with individual lobbying, attempting to wangle special treatment for their projects.
Ukrainian Gas Hub: Climax at Hand
The “zero hour” comes in less than a month: the contracts for gas transit through Ukraine and for supplying Russian gas to the country terminate at 10 am on 1 January. Meanwhile, Gazprom and Naftogaz are very far from looking for a mutually acceptable solution. The entire European gas business is watching intently the negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. Everyone is waiting for a new “gas war”: the January 2009 events proved to be a serious test both to European consumers and to Gazprom as a supplier. Is there still a chance of agreement? If there is not, will Gazprom cope with its obligations to deliver gas to Europe? Is Russia bluffing as it assures that the new infrastructure and gas in underground storage facilities will enable it to get by without Ukrainian transit even as soon as this winter? What will happen to Ukraine itself at the beginning of 2020?
Digitisation and Its Implications for Oil and Gas: Myths and Possible Reality

All reports for: 2015 , 14 , 13 , 12 , 11 , 10 , 09 , 08 , 07

Rambler's Top100
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts
Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.
National Energy Security Fund © 2007