Main page > Comments > Fuel & Energy > EU Hopes to Dump Russian Gas for Supplies from Turkmenistan
EU Hopes to Dump Russian Gas for Supplies from Turkmenistan
One problem: Turkmenistan is on the other side of the Caspian Sea. Financial, logistical and political problems to getting the infrastructure in place abound
During the Ukrainian crisis, Brussels and Washington have intensified their efforts to reduce Europe’s dependence on Russian gas.
The first step was to stop Russia’s South Stream project once and for all. Although South Stream enjoyed a lot of support in Europe, Brussels did its best to impede the project, and Washington eventually sent U.S. Senator John McCain to Bulgaria to deliver the final blow.
Russia responded by announcing that it will shift all its gas transit from Ukraine to Turkey, and the EU is now suffering the consequences of its “diplomatic victory.”
In dire need of alternative sources of gas supplies, Brussels decided to exped itelongstanding plans to import gas from Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan.
Turkey just hosted the groundbreaking ceremony of the Trans-Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline (TANAP), which will link the existing South Caucasus Pipeline with the planned Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) to bring natural gas from Azerbaijan to Europe. That won’t happen before 2020, and it is only a drop in the bucket because TAP’s initial capacity will be about ten billion cubic meters per year, with the option to expand the capacity up to 20 bcm/year.
By way of comparison, the maximum capacity of Russia’s South Stream pipeline would have been 63 bcm/year, and the same is true of the new “Turkish Stream” project.
But given the fact that Azerbaijan’s Shah Deniz 2 field will produce only 16 bcm/year, the EU cannot even use the maximum capacity of TAP and TANAP unless another gas supplier is found. This is where Turkmenistan comes in.
Last year, Turkmenistan and Turkey signed a framework agreement to supply gas to TANAP. Denis Daniilidis, EU Charge d’Affaires in Turkmenistan, told Reuters recently that the EU wants to revive the Trans-Caspian gas pipeline to this end. According to Daniilidis, EU Energy Commissioner Maros Sefcovic is going to visit the Central Asian country in coming months to restart talks about the project.
There are several reasons why that is a bad idea.
First of all, it doesn’t make much sense to deliver Turkmen gas across the Caspian Sea to Turkey, as long as TAP is the only pipeline which can bring the gas to customers in the EU. Even if the capacity of TAP is expanded, the pipeline can only accommodate a small amount of Turkmen gas. Nabucco is dead, and it is very likely that similar projects will also fail to get off the ground because nobody is willing to put up the money.
Speaking of which, it is unclear who is supposed to pay for the construction of the Trans-Caspian pipeline. Azerbaijan has indicated that the EU and Turkmenistan have to pick up the bill. Of course, neither is prepared to do so.
Turkmenistan desperately wants to diversify its gas exports, but as the folks from Stratfor have pointed out, the country faces “unprecedented economic and security challenges” in 2015, which affect its “willingness to participate in Western-oriented projects such as the Trans-Caspian natural gas pipeline.”
However, the biggest obstacle to the implementation of the project has always been, and will continue to be, Russian opposition.
Both Russia and Iran oppose the construction of any pipeline across the Caspian Sea due to its unresolved legal status. The EU would be well advised not to do something stupid before the five littoral states agree on the Caspian Sea’s status and maritime borders.
Moscow has warned Brussels repeatedly against meddling in the affairs of the Caspian Sea littoral states, stressing that the Trans-Caspian pipeline affects Russia’s legitimate interests.
Russian Foundation for Energy Security Director Kostantin Simonov was not exaggerating when he said, “the construction of this pipeline would mean to spit in the face of Russia and the real risk may be that of a military conflict, in front of which Russia will not pull back.”
Now it is up to Brussels to decide whether or not the Trans-Caspian pipe dream is worth the risk.
By Christoph Germann
Russia-insider.com, March 30, 2015
Nord Stream 2 and Ukraine: Costs Should Decide
There has been much discussion about how Russia – Europe’s biggest gas supplier – can continue to supply gas to Europe over the coming decades in the most secure and cost efficient way. Gazprom and its European partners have decided that building two additional pipelines through the Baltic Sea (Nord Stream 2) is the best commercial solution to secure future gas supplies for the EU, where gas production continues to decline and demand is expected to grow.
Shale Revolution: Myths and Realities
The boom in shale gas production in the US and its wide-ranging influence on markets rocked the gas world. Liquefied gas deliveries were redirected, altering the already fragile balance of demand and supply in traditional markets for pipeline gas in Europe.
Liquefied Natural Gas Outlook: Expectations and Reality
State regulation of the oil and gas sector in 2016, prospects for 2017
We traditionally conclude the year with our final report that sums up main events and tendencies of the outgoing year. The report analyzes preliminary production results, main state decisions concerning the sector, the struggle for property, changes in export policies, and, certainly, forecasts of the sector development in the medium-term perspective.
Gazprom: Goliath is not going to surrender
The European gas market: the life in the epoch of the Third Energy Package
The new report analyses the condition of the EU gas market, considers regulation practices and new initiatives planned for introduction, reviews infrastructure projects, and assesses prospects of the European gas market in the medium term.
Main regulators of oil and gas battles
Russia's political system has clearly become vibrant. Resignations and new appointments, personnel purging and scandals – these factors have become a new norm of current politics in Russia. Administrative competition in the country is growing, and it has evident outcomes in the oil and gas sector. The number of conflicts is expanding, while the role of state regulators is becoming very significant. Moreover, interests of companies in the sector do not always coincide, which puts regulators into a complicated situation. The National Energy Security Fund is focusing on key sectoral conflicts that relevant ministries and services are engaged in.
Middle East: an earthquake on the world market of hydrocarbons
Developments in the Middle East attract great attention. Many experts believe this region plays a major role in formation of oil prices and the future of the world market of hydrocarbons. The situation in the region is indeed developing very quickly. A conflict between Saudi Arabia and Iran has put an end to plans of creating OPEC-2. Saudi Arabia is changing its strategy, while Iran is increasing its presence on the world oil market; the latter also intends to become a serious natural gas exporter being ready to join the South Corridor project and intriguing against Russia. Meanwhile, the war in Syria may intensify at any moment affecting Iran’s production potential and Turkey’s transit possibilities. These events directly influence the supply of hydrocarbons on the market. It means all oil producers are concerned about them, at least because they need to understand the level of oil prices in the future.
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | ContactsConsulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.
National Energy Security Fund © 2007