Main page > Products > The fuel and energy complex of Russia - Series of analytical reports > Old and new routes of Russian gas to Europe: Belarusian scenario for Ukraine

Old and new routes of Russian gas to Europe: Belarusian scenario for Ukraine

Old and new routes of Russian gas to Europe: Belarusian scenario for Ukraine

The dénouement of the gas transit play on the post-Soviet area in nearing.

Gazprom’s policy on bringing gas prices for former Soviet republics to the European level and implementation of projects on bypassing traditional transit states for Russian natural gas made Belarus agree to give away its pipeline system to Gazprom. Ukraine is about to make the same decision.

However, political cycles in Russia and Ukraine currently impose certain restrictions on the sides.

This is especially noticeable in the behavior of Ukrainian ruling elites that vitally need a confident win at the parliamentary elections after Yulia Timoshenko’s imprisonment. The Party of Regions will be trying to ensure it at any cost. Meanwhile, the topic of the gas transportation system is still overly politicized in Ukraine.

A new report elaborates on the following issues:

  • Current condition of exports and transit of Russian natural gas to Europe

    • The current and future amount of transit
    • Existing contracts and variants of their prolongation
    • The future level of demand for Russian gas in Europe
  • Gazprom seizes the “Belarusian fortress”

    • Analyzing the technology of success: how Gazprom was pursuing its objective
    • Analysis of new contracts with Belarus and Russian gas prospects on the Belarusian market
  • Ukrainian transit and Ukrainian gas market

    • Importance of the Ukrainian route of supplies and the standing of the Ukrainian domestic gas market
    • Contract system and Kharkov agreements
    • The current condition of the Ukrainian GTS
  • Ukrainian GTS is in the grip

    • Arguments of Russia and counterarguments of Ukraine
    • Kiev’s attempts to attract Brussels to the dialogue
    • Dilemma: joint venture or gas transportation consortium
  • Risks and possibilities of Russian policies on organizing gas transit

    • Is the Belarusian gas scenario feasible for Ukraine?

 

The contents of the report:

Introduction 3
Chapter 1. Exports and transit of natural gas from Russia to Europe 4
  1.1. Volume of gas exports 4
  1.2. Outside Former Soviet States: Between Prices Linked To Oil And Take-Or-Pay Principle 5
  1.3 Supplies to CIS and Baltic states 8
  1.4. Existing routes of gas deliveries from Russia to Europe 10
Chapter 2. Settling Belarusian case 13
  2.1. Beltransgaz and construction of Yamal-Europe gas pipeline 13
  2.2. Contract for 2007 to 2011 17
  2.3. Transit conflict in 2010 19
  2.4. Seizure of Beltransgaz, New System of Relations 20
  2.5. Gas supplies and transit through Belarus in 2012 to 2014 21
Chapter 3. Ukrainian transit and gas market 23
  3.1. Major market 23
  3.2. Transit monopoly 27
  3.3. Contract system and its consequences 32
Chapter 4. Gas grips for Yanukovich 35
  4.1. North European gas pipeline 35
  4.2. South Stream 39
  4.3. Single Economic Space and joint enterprises 41
  4.4 Behavior of Ukrainian authorities 44
Chapter 5. Forecast. Is Belarusian gas scenario possible for Ukraine 49
  5.1. Contradictions Inside Ukrainian Authorities, Political Struggle 49
  5.2. Russia Increases Pressure: Reasons And Consequences 50
  5.3. Value of Ukraine’s GTS 52
Date of issue: March 13, 2012

If you are interested to obtain please contact » Elena Kim

Other issues:
Bookmark and Share

Analytical series “The Fuel and Energy Complex of Russia”:

State regulation of the oil and gas sector in 2018, prospects for 2019
Gazprom on Path to New Reality
Looking for Best Tax Treatment of Oil and Gas: Fiscal Experiments Continued
The subject of taxation became the absolute hit of 2018. The government once again decided to rewrite the rules of the game. President Putin’s new inauguration decree served as the main pretext. It turned out that about 8 trillion roubles extra was necessary for the new national projects announced. The Cabinet did not take long to decide where the funds should be taken. The result was acceleration of the so-called tax manoeuvre started as far back as 1 January 2015. It suggested shifting the tax burden to the wellhead: the effect on the state budget of gradual abandonment of the export duty will be more than compensated for by quicker growth in mineral resources extraction tax (MRET). The laws on tax reform have already gone through the parliament and will take effect as of next year. This means nothing good for companies.
Results of Pivot to the East in Oil and Gas Sector
New government structure and FES: Reformatting the state system administrating the sector

All reports for: 2015 , 14 , 13 , 12 , 11 , 10 , 09 , 08 , 07

Rambler's Top100
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts
Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.
National Energy Security Fund © 2007

LiveInternet