Main page > Products > The fuel and energy complex of Russia - Series of analytical reports > Looking for Best Tax Treatment of Oil and Gas: Fiscal Experiments Continued

Looking for Best Tax Treatment of Oil and Gas: Fiscal Experiments Continued

Looking for Best Tax Treatment of Oil and Gas:  Fiscal Experiments Continued

The subject of taxation became the absolute hit of 2018. The government once again decided to rewrite the rules of the game.

President Putin’s new inauguration decree served as the main pretext. It turned out that about 8 trillion roubles extra was necessary for the new national projects announced. The Cabinet did not take long to decide where the funds should be taken.

The result was acceleration of the so-called tax manoeuvre started as far back as 1 January 2015. It suggested shifting the tax burden to the wellhead: the effect on the state budget of gradual abandonment of the export duty will be more than compensated for by quicker growth in mineral resources extraction tax (MRET).

The laws on tax reform have already gone through the parliament and will take effect as of next year. This means nothing good for companies.

Having lost the drafting stage when the texts of the bills were formed, the companies now try get at least some compensation. The Finance Ministry suggests that the law on additional income tax (AIT) should be viewed as such. It would seem the industry has long since dreamt of it.

It is a taxation system innovative for Russia that would make it possible to switch from taxing revenue to taxing profits. Oil companies fought for that for years. Today, however, they do not seem to be happy, not hurrying to switch to the new taxation system, but demanding that good old privileges should be kept.

In the new report we consider in detail the following questions:

  • Four years with the tax manoeuvre – the first results

    • What has the new tax treatment resulted in for the state budget and companies?
    • Preliminary financial results of 2018
  • Acceleration of the tax manoeuvre

    • What are the implications for the industry?
  • Excise refunds as an attempt to sugar the pill for the main victim, the oil refining sector

    • Will new mechanisms be able to prevent growth in petrol prices on the domestic market or should direct government regulation be expected?
    • Schemes of compensation to oil companies for the acceleration of the tax manoeuvre – the words and the deeds
  • AIT – why do companies not want to endorse the experiment?

    • A comparison of AIT with incentives
    • How the law on AIT will be amended
  • The fate of hard-to-recover reserves – will the new taxation system help start their development?

  • What new amendments are to be expected in the near future?

    • The government promises stability of the new tax treatment, but active rewriting of fiscal rules is under way even now
    • What novelties should the industry expect?

Contents of the report:

Chapter 1. Debate on Tax Manoeuvre Completion: Finance Ministry Watching over Government Revenue 5
Chapter 2. Deceptive Export Incentives for Oil Industry 19
Chapter 3. Price of Tax Manoeuvre Completion: What Will Save Russian Oil Refining? 27
3.1 Transitional Procedure for Calculating MRET on Oil 27
3.2 Change of Mechanism for Calculating Excise on Petroleum Products 32
Chapter 4. AIT: Dream Not Yet Come True 45
Forecast of Developments 55
Date of release: December 19, 2018

If you are interested to obtain please contact » Elena Kim

Other issues:
Bookmark and Share

Analytical series “The Fuel and Energy Complex of Russia”:

Outlook for Russian LNG Industry
Russian Energy and West One Year after Ukraine Conflict Began: Are There Connections Still?
Green Agenda in Russia during Bitter Conflict with West
After February 2022 the agenda was radically rewritten. Western companies began leaving Russia en masse, economic relations with the West were drastically reduced, and the Russian economy began to be pushed violently from the global economic space, hemmed in by sweeping sanctions. All that was, to put it mildly, not the best background for talking about ESG. Especially because tasks of survival and stability under unprecedented pressure became the priority in the economy. In late 2022, however, attempts to reanimate the ESG agenda already became obvious. The message is put across insistently that it is important to Russia regardless of the foreign policy situation. While earlier the “green pivot” was seen as an opportunity to attract Western investors and their technological solutions to Russia, now Keynesian reliance on domestic manufacture is discussed.
Oil and Gas Sector Regulation in 2022 and Prospects for 2023
Gazprom at the Forefront of Economic and Political Battles with Europe
Gazprom is being actively thrown out of the market. Its annual supplies to Europe have shrunk from the previous 150 billion to 65 billion cubic metres of gas. European officials assure that they have already learnt how to live without Russian gas, so they will bring its purchases down to but nominal values in 2023. Their main hope is liquefied natural gas. Today the EU must make a crucial decision: whether it has passed the point of no return in gas business with Russia and whether it is certain that its economy will endure without supplies of Russian pipeline gas. Or, on the contrary, Europe will realise after all that the gas balance will not be achieved and the payment for so headlong a rush for LNG will be disproportionate. Assessment of the potential volume of LNG that will appear on the market before the end of the current decade will be the most important factor for making the decision.

All reports for: 2015 , 14 , 13 , 12 , 11 , 10 , 09 , 08 , 07

Rambler's Top100
About us | Products | Comments | Services | Books | Conferences | Our clients | Price list | Site map | Contacts
Consulting services, political risks assessment on the Fuel & Energy Industry, concern of pilitical and economic Elite within the Oil-and-Gas sector.
National Energy Security Fund © 2007